Harry potter and the deathly hallows: part 1 movie

Harry potter and the deathly hallows: part 1 movie movie#

All three, Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson have grown into full fledged actors perfectly capable of carrying even the most emotional scene. For the first time, theyвЂ™re old enough and adult enough to handle it.

Harry potter and the deathly hallows: part 1 movie movie#

Those scenes anchor this movie and ask more of its actors than any Harry Potter movie ever has before. In the filmвЂ™s more intimate moments it becomes about three kids whom youвЂ™ve seen grow up on screen stepping into their own as adults. If youвЂ™re able to hang in there through the Potterbabble, youвЂ™ll eventually be rewarded, because when Deathly Hallows settles in for real, character development it absolutely soars. In the books that attention to detail is perhaps one of the storyвЂ™s strengths, but if you havenвЂ™t read them or havenвЂ™t memorized every detail of the previous movies, then in this film itвЂ™s just a big muddle. ItвЂ™s worse than simply mired in it really, much of the movieвЂ™s plot is built almost entirely on it. In much the same way Trek has in the past committed the sin of drowning its audience in meaningless technology chatter, Deathly Hallows is inexorably mired in the endless names and details and spells and trinkets of the Potter universe. In Deathly Hallows maybe itвЂ™s more correct to call this a problem of Potterbabble. The most recent Star Trek incarnation strove to solve this problem by focusing on relationships rather than technology, and in the process created something that every audience member could buy into whether or not theyвЂ™ve read the Star Fleet Technical Manual.

In the past itвЂ™s been most often applied to things like the Star Trek franchise, when characters have prattled on so endlessly about the buttons theyвЂ™re pushing, that it overshadows anything genuine or human the less techno-savvy members of the audience might have been able to latch on to. Technobable is a term coined to describe the overuse of technical jargon.